Private Field Used by Dog Walkers for Many Years is Fenced Off

The official footpath is being fenced off by the landowner of the field below Gillotts Field who live in Harpsden Hill House which has recently been put on the market to sell.  This field has been used by many walkers over many years.

Harpsden Hill House has 22 acres of land including the field is on the market for £2,975,000 with Simmons & Sons estate agents.  The notice below has been put up on the fencing to inform walkers.


Edward Dixon from Simmons & Sons said, “Our clients have given permitted access to the field for over 40 years but over the years they have put up signs to remind people that is private land and is registered to them.  Because of the abuse by walkers, which has seen in recent years, areas of the field worn down to earth it has got to the point that they needed to do something.  They are in discussion with Natural England on how to re-energise and regenerate the field which could see planting of wildflowers or grazing on it for sheep.  Apologies to all those people who are inconvenienced, but it is a wider problem that needs to be sorted out.”

Sarah Laing who regularly walks her dog on this field said, “Myself and fellow dog walkers are very upset to see new fences being erected in the field  below Gillotts field. Seemingly the whole field is being shut off apart from the public footpath going diagonally across the field. This action seems completely unnecessary and insulting to the majority of users of this beautiful long-used gem. The reasons given on the notice are, quite frankly, lame. Walkers use the path around the field or the public footpath through the middle. I have never seen anyone ‘off path’ damaging the wildlife as is claimed. I would also question the truth in the ‘not for development’ claim (is this a case of watch this space?). I understand that the field is privately owned, but is this really necessary- what happened to community spirit – and why now after all these years?”

Kate Ashbrook, General Secretary of the Open Spaces Society said, “My understanding is that there is a recorded public footpath across the field which the owners are fencing off. Provided they do not obstruct it or reduce the official width (which may not be recorded on the definitive map) that is not an offence. I do not understand there to be any other recorded rights of way across the field. However, if people have been using another route or routes, without permission, without being stopped, for 20 years, they may be able to claim it as a public footpath. It does look as though the landowners have been granting permissive access for a while so the 20 years would need to be 20 years back from the point at which they granted permissive access.

If local people have been roaming generally across the field, not sticking to particular routes, and using the whole area for recreation, they may be able to claim it as a village green – provided they can prove 20 years use before any permission was granted, and they have not been challenged. As you know, registration as a green gives local people rights of recreation on the land and protects it from development or encroachment.”


  1. Jeff Bridges says:

    I fully agree with the choice to fence off this footpath, on my walks I have found numerous dog mess bags. In fact, I have been down the footpath while the workmen are putting up fence and seen dog walkers bring quite rude to them. The opposition to this fence is quite frankly, lame.

    • Vivienne McNamara says:

      I have to disagree with the comments made with reference to dog mess/poo bags. I have been walking round this field regularly and have found it to be one of the cleanest spaces around. I do find it coincidental, as do the majority of people who walk there, that concern for the environment and wildlife comes at the exact same time that the property and land is on the market!

      • Louise harper says:

        I really don’t see that it’s anyone else’s business if the farmer DOES want to fence off his land prior to sale, it’s his private land and he presumably has paid for it. He is not attempting to fence off a public footpath and he has allowed people access to enjoy and walk across land that they wouldn’t have been able to walk across if he hadn’t. It wouldn’t inspire me to allow permissive access to land if I thought people could just claim it as a village green because of an act of kindness.

  2. Jack Snow says:

    if people keep on letting their dogs shit everywhere, putting it in bags and HANGGING THEM ON TREES instead of taking them away then what are you to complain that they fence off the fields? every time i try going for a walk in the woods near me in henley there is ALWYAS dog shit bags hung in trees. it is disgusting. dog shit rots. plastic does not. put it in the hegde instead.


Leave a Comment

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.